Category Archives: Jarod Kilgore

Fixing the Designated Hitter Debate: A Submission

I like tradition. I like that the man who invented basketball coached at my favorite school, even if he was probably the worst coach in the school’s history. I like Notre Dame because of what they used to be, though it has little to do with what they are today.

I like the old ways. I like reading stories out of books, while acknowledging a tablet would be more convenient. I like meeting friends over coffee to talk in person, even if I already text them regularly.

I also like sports. I like when my teams are good because I like when they win. When I watch professional sports I want to watch two teams play each other at their best, with all their stars healthy and their artillery available.

When I watch sports, especially at the professional level, I want them to play at their highest level. Seeing pitchers who rarely practice hitting, run the bases in windbreakers, and refuse to run hard or slide into bases is not the sport at its highest level.

If the teams and their coaches took pitchers hitting seriously I would be happy with it, I’d probably want it in the American League as well as the National League, but they don’t.

However, I give up trying to convince defenders of these offensive hackers. National League pitchers are going to continue to embarrass themselves as long as their fans want it, and I submit to their stubbornness. At least that’s what I’d tell them if I made the rules.

And then submit a work-around.

Make the Designated Hitter optional in the National League. If the home team is from the NL they will have the option of both teams either having or not having the designated hitter.

The strategy traditionalists esteem is still present but on a larger scale, because the home NL team would have to factor their prospective designated hitter with that of their opponents.

The big market teams in the National League would spend money on a “most-time” DH that could be used at home and during interleague play. If the Dodgers employed a Victor Martinez-quality player at DH, it would force medium-market NL teams to keep pace by having a decent 9th batter as well. This would continue to trickle-down to the bottom market teams in the same way. In a matter of only a few years every NL team would have made attempts to acquire a “most-time” designated hitter, who they would choose to deploy in their home ballparks depending on the strategy of the situation.

The NL team will make this decision for the duration of the series – so if the San Francisco Giants have a 3 game home series against the Boston Red Sox they must decide when submitting their lineup card for the first game if the DH will be used in that series.

Once more teams have a 9th hitter worthy of playing every day but weak in the field, MLB would introduce the idea of a full-time DH for both leagues. The use of a some-time DH would make the transition to full-time designated hitters in both leagues more palatable to the NL and its fans.

And I would no longer have to watch pitchers in windbreakers embarrassing themselves on the base paths.

The NBA’s Most Exciting Young Team

I have a *thing* for young athletic men full of unrealized potential. If you’re thinking *like that* then I’m not saying *like that*, but I definitely swooned a bit watching Anthony Davis last year, before he was definitely one of the best 5 players in the NBA. It’s great watching that kind of talent blossom so fully only 3 years removed from receiving his John R. Wooden Award, but for me some of the fun is lost in the transition from a young player oozing potential and when that ooze materializes into a star.

That said, I like the young teams just putting things together, when you can still see their abilities and minds merging into a cohesive basketball unit one game at a time. I feel like every year there is a Most Exciting Young Team that I really enjoy watching. Last year it was the Phoenix Suns – with the Morris twins tossing in threes, Goran Dragic and Eric Bledsoe as the primary ball handlers (I’ll try not to refer to them as Point Guards, cus, ya know, they were mostly scorers who got to dribble the ball a lot). (footnote 1)

If you didn’t read the footnote (how dare you!) then the point is: last year’s Phoenix Suns wasn’t very good, but they were a lot of fun to watch. And stayed in contention long enough (finished 1 game behind the 8th seed Mavericks) to make their games matter all season.

Every year I try to find the Most Exciting Young Team. Sometimes I pick wrong. Sometimes fun is just a small part of the larger phrase “I’d like a refund. No, I’m sorry.”

With all that I nominate my first hope for this year’s Most Exciting Young Team: The Milwaukee Bucks

Milwaukee hasn’t been fun for a long time. It’s probably easier to be good than fun (mostly because no GM’s goal is to be just fun), but the Bucks haven’t been much of either since Generation Y hit pre-school [2]. Well, this year will be half different!

They have the most NBA-ready rookie (I feel like this is a straight-up ESPN trademarked term) in Jabari Parker. And as if to increase the fun times: Parker is really only NBA-ready on the offensive end.

If he was their most fun player the Bucks would only make it as high on the Fun Rankings as an up-and-down rookie season could deliver, but he definitely is not.

Enter the ring, Giannis Antetokounmpo.

He’s a beautiful 6’10” basketball machine in his second NBA season from Greece. He’s raw but has already shown huge improvement since his rookie year. And he just turned 20 on December 6th. The Greek highlight machine uses his long arms and high basketball IQ to keep his talented and flawed team in games. Antetokounmpo has done something great almost every night, but the one that made the most rounds about the Internet is this double block:

http://www.vineroulette.com/v/I-mean-this-is-why-we-keep-talking-about-Giannis-Antetokounmpo-MmUmvpXmBMJ

[footnote 3]

Milwaukee is currently the sixth seed in the Eastern Conference. That doesn’t mean they’re good, but it helps the excite-o-meter of a young team if their games still matter late in the season.

For whatever reason, the Milwaukee franchise saw fit to give the young duo teammates. Teammates with names like OJ Mayo, Jerryd Bayless Brandon Knight, and Ersan Ilyasova (4). All of them can have personal spurts of fun times but the most interesting, for me and the Bucks franchise, are the building blocks of Parker and Antetokounmpo. These guys will hopefully feed off each other for years to come, and if they crumble under the pressure of being my first (probably not last) pick for Most Exciting Young Team in the NBA, then they will almost certainly be on the short list next season.

Footnotes:

  1. Last season, Eric Bledsoe’s 1.64 Assist/Turnover ratio was the 2nd worst in the league (46 out of 47) among qualified point guards (Alec Burks was a distant last at 1.42. But, be real, Burks isn’t a PG and never should be but when you’re contractually obligated to field a basketball team it’s good manners for one of your five players on the court to bring up the ball – of those, Burks was often the most qualified).

The Suns other sort-of point guard last season was Goran Dragic. He had 2.10 A/To ratio, which would have tied for 38th out of 47 Point Guards (if he was considered a PG – which he’s not, but he has been during his career and was at times last year).

2.Last winning season for the Bucks was 2009-10 – and that was their only winning season since Ray Allen was donning those purple road unis. The Milawauke franchise has had five winning season since 1990-91 (not including the strike shortened 98-99 season).

2.A personal favorite from my favorite highlight machine: the finger-roll where he doesn’t dribble for 25 feet (and it wasn’t traveling!)

https://vine.co/v/OvLBKUbMmuJ

4.Or as he should be known, the Turkish James Franco:

http://a.espncdn.com/combiner/i?img=/i/headshots/nba/players/full/2767.png&w=3

Sunday Night Football

AFC West Preview: Denver Broncos @ Kansas City Chiefs

If the Broncos win they will all but be guaranteed a home playoff game, and be in the driver’s seat for a first round bye. If the Chiefs win they will show the loss to the Raiders on Thursday Night Football was a trap game mishap, and the rest of the football world could start fearing a playoff game in Arrowhead Stadium. Here’s a breakdown of each side of the ball.

When the Broncos Pass: Advantage Broncos

Kansas City allows the least passing yards in the NFL, but there’s more to an effective pass defense than just yardage. Defensive coordinator Bob Sutton has done a fine job covering the weaknesses of his personnel, but the weaknesses are aplenty.

Sutton has effectively cast a shadow over his defense’s deficiencies for the second year in a row, but his unit has only forced 8 turnovers all year, with only 4 interceptions. There is some tremendous talent on defense (Poe, Houston are both probably the second best at their position in the NFL), but there is little talent in the secondary right now.

Peyton Manning threw for the second-least yards he’s thrown all year in the first matchup (week 2), which makes it appear the Chiefs pass defense performed well. In reality Manning had one of his most effective, efficient games of the season. On the road he will have slightly less success, but he will have another good game, and keep an eye on running back C.J Anderson making big catches out of the backfield.

Since Eric Berry (read more under X-factor) won’t be a part of the game, Ron Parker will likely be moved back to safety, where’s he’s pretty solid. That means either an underwhelming corner such as Chris Owens or 3rd round pick Philip Gaines. Whatever unfortunate soul takes the spot, I expect Emmanuel Sanders to dominate the matchup all night long.

When the Chiefs Pass: PUSH

The Chiefs passing game is an extension of their running game. Alex Smith is neither a boon or a detriment to his team, he simply exists. He’s like the ghost runner version of a quarterback, plodding from base to base, never making a mistake, never making a play. There will likely be no mistakes for the Broncos to take advantage of, and nothing for the Chiefs to be proud of. Congratulations, Chiefs fans (like me), you have this guy for another four years.

Demarcus Ware and Von Miller have combined for 19 sacks this season, but only 3 in the last 4 games. Alex Smith has a tendency to hold to ball too long behind a poor pass-blocking offensive line, so they will get a couple Sunday night.

When the Broncos run: Advantage Broncos

C.J. Anderson has never made anyone miss a tackle his entire life, but he can run downhill and break arm tackles – and that’s all the Broncos need against one of the worst run defenses in the NFL. Kansas City lost their pro-bowl middle linebacker, Derrick Johnson, and his backup, Joe Mays, and have since been patching their run defense with whatever they find in the scrap drawer. Right now those scraps are called James Michael-Johnson and Josh Mauga, and though they have some ability, they’re in over their heads replacing the former all-pro.

I expect Anderson to run effectively, and for offensive coordinator Peyton Manning to stick with the run all game the entire game.

When the Chiefs run: Advantage Chiefs

Jamaal Charles hasn’t been a big play threat in the running game for two years – since Andy Reid took in 2013 Charles has had his two worst yards per carry averages of his career – but he still averages over 5 yards each time he runs. The offensive line is average at run blocking and gives Charles and backup Knile Davis enough room to run effectively. When Alex Smith drops back he’s effectively a third running back, running for a first down 9 times in 35 rushing attempts.

Special Teams: Advantage Chiefs

The Broncos are on their third kicker this season, bringing in former Chief Connor Barth this week to replace the worst field goal percentage kicker in the league. Barth brings the accuracy, but doesn’t have the reputation of a strong leg for kickoffs.

That’s where former Oregon Duck De’Anthony Thomas makes his mark. If he gets his hands on a couple kicks you’ll see him on SportsCenter’s Top 10 when you’re getting ready for work Monday morning. Chiefs kicker Cairo Santos has overcome some rookie jitters to convert 14 consecutive attempts.

Coaching: Chiefs

Peyton Manning is coordinating this offense, and Sutton can’t hide his defense’s inefficiencies any longer. But Andy Reid is a better coach than John Fox, and he has had more time to prepare since the Chiefs got embarrassed on a Thursday night game last week – the extra time off gives the Chiefs the edge.

X-Factor: Eric Berry

The first team all-pro selection found out after last week’s game he likely has lymphona, meaning he’s currently fighting a battle for his life. I expect the Arrowhead crowd and the players in red to rally around their embattled leader, and the effects will be seen on the field.

Prediction:

The Denver Broncos are the better team, and now that they’ve found a serviceable running game, the Super Bowl is once again an attainable goal. However, Arrowhead Stadium, the Eric Berry factor, the extra time to rest, and coming off an embarrassing loss all amounts to the lesser team making enough plays to win this game. I expect the Chiefs to not turn the ball over, keep the game close, and make at least one big play on special teams.

Chiefs: 30

Broncos: 27

Equal Playing Field: How long until women are just another guy

Hundreds or thousands of years from now every member of the human race may be an androgynous blob of mass and energy, a la the Drej in Titan A.E., with no discernible differences between male and female, but right now there are real (and imagined) differences between the genders. Women will be a part of popular men’s professional sports. But which will be the first to have its deflector shield broken? And how long will it take?

It takes a long time for sweeping societal change, but once it begins, it happens quickly. It works the same in sports: Jackie Robinson broke baseball’s color barrier in 1947 – after 63 years of segregation, but 12 years later every MLB team was integrated.

I readily admit this is going to be an incomplete examination of the issue. I’ll barely talk about the social obstructions surrounding gender integration, and that may be a mountain of an obstacle compared to the molehill that is physical ability, but this is merely a musing to start a discussion.

I think the greatest obstacle to a woman playing a major men’s sport is social perception, but there are hurdles firmly planted in the tangible portion of reality as well. Here are some arguments for each of the three major American sports (sorry, hockey/soccer fans. You may deserve an in-depth analysis on this topic, but I’m not the guy to do it) and my unscientific assessment of what the future will bring.

NFL

Why it will be first:

There are multiple examples of women playing high school and college football as a kicker, and since it is a low-contact position it’s the likeliest spot for a woman to earn playing time. But that’s not the only option.

The examples are rare, but there have been some women playing contact positions with men in college and low-level professional leagues. For example, Shelby Osborne is a 5’6” 140 lb incoming freshman cornerback for Campbellsville University. She sounds small, but if 59 year-old Mike Flynt can play linebacker at Sul Ross State, there is a position for a physically developed, highly athletic young woman. On top of that, many people don’t realize it but there is an all-women full-contact professional football league (actually, there’s three) with more than 40 teams.

Why it won’t:

There are only 32 kickers in the NFL, and those currently employed are annually breaking records for accuracy and distance – resulting, somewhat ironically, in a perpetual undervaluing of their position on draft day. Because of this, even if a young woman proves her ability as a kicking phenom at a high-college level I don’t believe they will be given a realistic chance due to the culture surrounding the most macho American sport.

Yes, there are some women who’ve played college football at positions other than kicker, but there are few on record (I found three, going back to the ‘70s), and nowhere near the highest level of collegiate competition. The physical demands of the sport of American Football at the NFL level is too great to be overcome in any reasonable amount of time.

Verdict:

Never/100+ years. These guys are huge. The physical gap between NFL players and other world-class male athletes is enormous, they’re level 90 Orc Warriors and regular people are basically squirrels.

I think the NFL in its current form will never have a female player. There is too much competition for the undervalued non-contact positions, and with the growing public awareness of long-term health risks associated with the sport I believe American Football in its current form will cease to exist before a female player will play at its highest level.

MLB

Why it will be first:

For one, it doesn’t possess the physical boundaries of football. Further, it has a past of fording the controversy surrounding integration – of which it’s very proud.

When Johnny Manziel (28th round) and Michael Vick (30th) get drafted despite not playing baseball in college and high school, respectively, then the 40 round MLB draft might be 15 rounds longer than needed. However, you would expect a franchise to take a chance on a talented young woman, whenever one is deemed worthy. They may be willing to take this chance because baseball franchises have by far the best developing system for their prospects. Every MLB organization has at least five minor league affiliates (1/3 have six) – this is the best possible training ground for a successful baseball career

It’s hinted in a previous B4andMore article that Little League World Series phenom Mo’ne Davis could lead a trend of female baseball players in the Majors. I believe with her dominating performance and enchanting personality she very well may start a trend of young girls playing with 12-year-old boys on the baseball diamond.

Why it won’t:

Mo’ne Davis may seem a good argument for a female pitcher in the Big Leagues, but at 12 years of age girls are typically more physically developed than boys. I think Davis could certainly be a trailblazer for more young girls to play in the Little League World Series, but in the coming years she will be surpassed physically by her male classmates. There have already been 16 girls to play with the boys in Williamsport other than Davis, and you may have noticed none made it to the Majors.

Verdict:

Second most likely. In the next 50 years a woman will play in a Major League Baseball game; a woman will be drafted in the next 40 years.

Davis said, in an interview with ESPN, her true dream is to play basketball for Geno Auriemma at the University of Connecticut. I believe if she, or any young woman, is to further blaze trails through male-dominated sports, she’s made a good choice for her future sport. In my opinion, basketball is the most likely major sport to have a female join its ranks.

What a perfect segue!

NBA

Why it will be first:

The NBA’s reputation for drafting unrealized potential exists because they’re willing to take chances other sports might not. Further lessening risk, second round picks aren’t guaranteed a contract, making a difficult decision easier. Though the NBA’s developmental league is nowhere near that of baseball’s minor leagues, it is quickly improving.

The NBA has some of the best athletes in the world, but you don’t need to jump out of the gym to perform at a high level for a long time (Paul Pierece, Dirk Nowitzki, Steve Nash). However, the prototype for a barrier-breaking woman in basketball isn’t the 6’8” dominating force that is Brittney Griner. She’s simply not tall or long enough to succeed near the basket in the NBA. Instead, it will be someone more like Candace Parker, a 6’4” guard with an all-around game, possessing uncommon but not unbelievable athleticism (I first learned her name when she won the McDonald’s All-American dunk contest against all-male competition, less than a year after she’d torn her ACL).

Now that we can imagine what she might look like, the biggest reason why she can succeed is simply because the men’s and women’s game is so similar – essentially being as different as the NBA is to FIBA rules. Differences include ball-size, 3-point arc, and a 30-second shot clock – with the right player, these could certainly be overcome.

Against:

Despite not having the physical barriers of football, an average male NBA player would still have multiple advantages over most potential female NBAers: height (and length), strength, and possibly speed.

Candace Parker winning a dunk contest against men (though she clearly completed less difficult dunks) and Brittney Griner slamming basketballs all over her competition is obviously a harbinger of the talent becoming a part of the women’s game. However, the fact these physical feats are still recognized and written about shows how far away the women’s game is from the men’s on an athletic level.

Verdict: I believe there will be a female basketball player playing in a regular season game in the NBA in the next 15 years.

Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, mentioned he was interested in drafting Brittney Griner in the second round in 2013. Griner left only dust and debris in her wake during her time at Baylor as she was clearly the most dominant force in women’s NCAA basketball history. There may not be a better player than her in the next couple decades, but there will be a better NBA prospect. I expect a woman to be drafted by a team in the next 10 years. Though that woman may never actually make a game day roster (think Michael Sam in the NFL) I believe a talented young woman will fully break the next invisible barrier and play real minutes in the NBA in 15 years or less.